中学生英语作文 “对垃圾食品说不”
Say ‘No’ to Junk Food
Written by 6C Tam Chung Him
Walking along the street, it could be easily observed that youngsters tend to visit fastfood stalls selling burgers and soft drinks or street stalls selling curry fishballs. They simply prefer them to traditional meals or even healthy meals. Besides the low nutrition value and lack of fibres from green vegetables, vast amounts of fat, particularly trans fat, starts alarming the public. In response to the government’s promotion on healthy diet, our tuck shop has been told not to sell ‘junk food’. However, parents, teachers and students take on quite different views and, consequently, they seem not to have reached any compromises yet.
Although parents and teachers seem to be on the same side, their interrelational effects are quite subtle. Teachers are indeed caught in a dilemma. On the one hand, they have the responsibility to take care of their students’ health as professional educators. On the other hand, they could be in trouble if some students accused them for ignoring students’ right to choose. Balancing the pros and cons, of course the school put the students’ welfare first. This can also be seen as a boon to the society because improving the health standard of students today means relieving society’s medical burden in future. Last, but not least, schools are committed to providing students with the right value instead of fulfilling their every request.
From parents’ viewpoint, the opinions could be quite divided. The majority would consider the ban on junk food at school as a blessing. Some may be misled by the shocking adverse effects greatly exaggerated by the media. Despite the fact that cancer, heart attack, coronary disease and obesity are developed if – and only if – one takes in food with high fat content and low nutrition value constantly over a long time in vast amounts, parents often receive a distorted view: they think not only junk food, but other unhealthy snacks should be banned. They think the school has not yet got the job done. Some may think the reason they send their kids to school is to ‘enjoy’ school life, but not to ‘suffer’. They are the ones who put kids’ happiness at the first place. These polarized views could slow down the discussion considerably. Ignorant parents may even think schools should solely shoulder the responsibility.
Students are the recipients of the service. They are of course the major critics of the idea. No matter what their views towards junk food are, they would not welcome the idea of having their choices reduced. For the junk food supporters, obviously they are the major victims, since they will not stop consuming junk food even if they are asked to. The lack of students’ support puts students and teachers in different ends and they lack mutual understanding.
Concerning this issue, parents should understand the school’s standpoint and act as a bridge between the school and students. Parents could start the practice at home and make sure the students understand the meaning of the policy. Students should be made willing to support the school, instead of being forced to. The school should explicitly point out the dark side of junk food so that the students can understand why they should not eat it, instead of restricting them. This may be a counterproductive way because the students may even take in more junk food in their leisure time. Never will the school succeed if she works alone. It is high time the school allied with parents to give the students a healthy future.
说‘不’的垃圾食品
重生者必有潭涌他写的
沿着大街行走,可以很方便地观察到年轻人打算去参观小吃小摊,卖汉堡和软饮料或街头小摊,卖着咖喱fishballs。他们只是喜欢他们传统的饭菜和甚至健康的饭菜。除了低营养价值和缺乏纤维从绿色蔬菜,大量的脂肪,尤其是反式脂肪,开始令人担忧的公众。在回应的政府的促进健康的节食,我们的塔克商店已被告知不要卖“垃圾食品”。然而,家长、老师和学生们选择完全不同的观点,因此,他们似乎并没有达成任何妥协呢。
尽管父母和老师似乎是站在同一边,他们的interrelational效应是相当敏感。老师确实陷入进退两难的境地。一方面,他们有责任照顾他们的学生健康以及专业的教育工作者。另一方面,他们将会很麻烦,如果一些学生被他们忽视学生的选择权利。平衡利弊,当然学校学生的福利放在第一位。这也可以被看作是一个恩赐给那些社会,因为提高健康水平的学生在今天意味着缓解社会的医疗负担,在未来的。最后,但并非最不重要的一点是,学校也在致力于给学生提供正确的值代替履行自己的每一个要求。
从父母的观点、看法可能蛮分开。大多数人会考虑在学校禁止垃圾食品的美好祝福。一些人可能会被严重夸大了这令人震惊的不利影响的媒体。尽管事实是患癌症、心脏病、冠心病和肥胖是发达如果-且仅当-你花在吃脂肪含量高的事物和低营养价值不断在很长一段时间在数额巨大,父母经常接受一种扭曲的观点:他们认为不仅垃圾食物,但其他那些不健康的零食应被禁止。他们认为学校尚未完成了工作。有些人会认为这就是为什么他们送小孩上学的学校是“享受生活,但不要抓得“受”。而他们正是把孩子们的幸福放在第一位。这些极化的观点将拖慢讨论较多。无知的父母甚至可能认为学校应该单独承担责任。
学生大部分接受该服务。他们当然是主要的批评家的主意。不管发生什么,他们的观点对垃圾食品,他们会不受欢迎的想法让他们选择减少。对垃圾食品的支持者,很明显,他们是最大的受害者,因为他们将不会停止食用垃圾食品,即使它们要求。学生的支持的缺乏使学生和教师在不同的结束和他们缺乏相互理解。
针对这一问题,父母应该了解学校的立场,并且作为学校和学生之间的桥梁。家长可以先在家修行,确保学生瞭解政策的意义。学生应该愿意支持的学校,而不是被迫的。学校应该明确指出黑暗面的垃圾食物使学生能够理解他们为什么不应该吃它,而不是限制他们。这可能是一个反作用的方式因为学生们甚至可以吸收
本文地址：http://www.dioenglish.com/writing/gaozhong/102396.html
